{"id":7291,"date":"2011-08-07T12:43:27","date_gmt":"2011-08-07T19:43:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/?p=7291"},"modified":"2011-08-07T12:43:27","modified_gmt":"2011-08-07T19:43:27","slug":"live-blogging-curiosity-hawking-and-god","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2011\/08\/07\/live-blogging-curiosity-hawking-and-god\/","title":{"rendered":"Live-Blogging Curiosity, Hawking, and God"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tonight&#8217;s the premiere of <a href=\"http:\/\/curiosity.discovery.com\/group\/curiosity\/about\"><em>Curiosity<\/em> on the Discovery Channel<\/a>, featuring Stephen Hawking talking about cosmology and God, followed by the <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2011\/08\/02\/hawking-and-god-on-the-discovery-channel\/\">&#8220;Curiosity Conversation&#8221; panel that I&#8217;m on<\/a> along with David Gregory, Paul Davies, and John Haught.  Hawking&#8217;s hour-long show is scheduled for 8pm Eastern\/5pm Pacific, and will then repeat 3 hours later (11E\/8P).  Our half-hour panel discussion follows immediately afterward &#8212; you do the arithmetic.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a lot to say about these shows, and in particular there&#8217;s a huge amount that we didn&#8217;t have time to say during the panel.  So as I sit in front of the TV, I&#8217;ll be live-blogging along by adding updates to this post.  This will be the early show, so the fun will happen 8pm-9:30pm Eastern.  Hey, <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/NathanFillion\">Nathan Fillion<\/a> live-tweets during <em>Castle<\/em>, so why not me?  There is also a <a href=\"http:\/\/curiosity.discovery.com\/topic\/space-exploration\/did-god-create-universe-social.htm\">chat<\/a> going on at the Discovery site.<\/p>\n<p>The main attraction of Hawking&#8217;s program <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2010\/09\/02\/stephen-hawking-settles-the-god-question-once-and-for-all\/\">is not that he has disproven the existence of God<\/a>.  Certainly I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s going to be changing the minds of many religious believers.  His argument is essentially that the universe is self-contained, and doesn&#8217;t really have &#8220;room&#8221; for God (nor any need to invoke a creator).  It&#8217;s very easy to wriggle free of that conclusion, if you are inclined not to accept it.<\/p>\n<p>But &#8220;changing people&#8217;s minds&#8221; isn&#8217;t the only reason to talk about something, even about controversial issues.  Religion, like sex and death, is one of those topics where it&#8217;s very difficult to simply have a dispassionate discussion without making people uncomfortable.  It can happen within a group of similarly-minded people, of course, but once a wider range of views gets involved, it&#8217;s hard to maintain comity.  (Comedy, on the other hand, is pretty easy.)  I don&#8217;t mean everyone has to agree &#8212; just the opposite.  We should be able to talk about things we completely disagree on, while still <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2010\/01\/04\/being-polite-and-being-right\/\">maintaining level heads<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s why I think this episode of <em>Curiosity<\/em> is potentially important. It&#8217;s a forthright statement of a view that doesn&#8217;t often get aired in American media.  Even if nobody&#8217;s mind is changed, simply talking rationally about this issues would be a step forward.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pre-show update:<\/strong>  I should note ahead of time that I was not wearing a tie. Haught, Davies, and Gregory were all wearing ties.  But Hawking wasn&#8217;t. Maybe atheists don&#8217;t wear ties?  (Although I&#8217;m pretty sure Jesus never wore a tie, either.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Start:<\/strong>  We begin with a disclaimer! These are Stephen Hawking&#8217;s opinions, not those of Discovery. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p><strong>4 minutes:<\/strong> I hope the analogy here is clear.  &#8220;People who believe God made the universe are kind of like the Vikings shouting at the Sun to stop a solar eclipse.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>8 minutes:<\/strong> Snark aside, the message here is a fundamental one.  Nature obeys laws!  Something that&#8217;s certainly not <em>a priori<\/em> obvious or necessary, but a really profound truth.<\/p>\n<p><strong>14 minutes:<\/strong> I wasn&#8217;t able to find an independent confirmation of this story about Pope John XXI condemning the idea of &#8220;laws of nature.&#8221;  (It&#8217;s true that he did die when the roof collapsed.)  Presumably this refers to the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Condemnations_of_1210%E2%80%931277\">Condemnations of 1277<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>20 minutes:<\/strong> The universe is a big, messy, complicated, and occasionally quite intricate place.  On the face of it, the idea that it&#8217;s all the working-out of some impersonal patterns of matter and energy, rather than being constructed by some kind of conscious intelligence, is pretty remarkable.  (But true nonetheless.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>27 minutes:<\/strong> Hey, a tiny ad for <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2011\/07\/11\/discovery-retreats\/\">Discovery Retreats<\/a>!<\/p>\n<p><strong>28 minutes:<\/strong> Hawking says Einstein might be the greatest scientist ever.  He has long favored Einstein over Newton, I&#8217;m not sure why.  Hawking appeared on an episode of <em>Star Trek: TNG<\/em>, where he was a hologram playing poker with Einstein, Newton, and Data.  He actually wrote the script, and Newton doesn&#8217;t come off well.<\/p>\n<p><strong>36 minutes:<\/strong> Ah, negative energy.  Depends on what you mean by &#8220;energy,&#8221; but this isn&#8217;t the venue to get overly technical, obviously.  Roughly, matter has positive energy and gravity has negative energy.  That&#8217;s hopefully enough to help people swallow the crucial point: you can make a universe for nothing.  There isn&#8217;t some fixed resource, out of which we can make a universe or two, before we hit Peak Universe.  There can be an infinite number of universes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>41 minutes:<\/strong> People on Twitter are asking why Hawking doesn&#8217;t have a British accent.  He easily could, of course; voice-synthesis technology has come quite a way since he first got the system.  But he&#8217;s said that he now identifies with that voice he got years ago, and doesn&#8217;t want to change it; it&#8217;s identified with him.<\/p>\n<p><strong>47 minutes:<\/strong> Okay, here&#8217;s the payoff.  He&#8217;s saying that generally we&#8217;re used to effects being caused by pre-existing events.  (The first step toward a <a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/cosmological-argument\/\">cosmological argument<\/a> for God&#8217;s existence.)  You might think that a chain of causation takes you back to the Big Bang, which then requires God as a cause.  But no!  The Big Bang can just &#8230; be.<\/p>\n<p><strong>50 minutes:<\/strong> The point of the black hole discussion is to get to the idea of a singularity, a conjectural point of infinite curvature and density.  The Big Bang, in classical general relativity, is also a singular moment.  But classical GR isn&#8217;t right.  We need quantum gravity.  Hawking believes that quantum gravity smooths the singularity and explains how there was no pre-existing time.  (At least in the TV show, unlike <em>A Brief History<\/em>, he doesn&#8217;t start talking about &#8220;imaginary time.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p><strong>56 minutes:<\/strong> Ultimately Hawking&#8217;s argument against God is pretty simplistic.  He assumes that if God created the Big Bang, God must have existed before the Big Bang, but there was no &#8220;before the Big Bang,&#8221; QED.  It&#8217;s easy enough to simply assert that God doesn&#8217;t exist &#8220;within time&#8221; (if that means anything).  It would have been better (IMHO) to emphasize that modern cosmology has many good ideas about how the universe could have come to be, so there&#8217;s no need to rely on a divine creator.<\/p>\n<p><strong>58 minutes:<\/strong> Final thought from SWH: <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2011\/05\/23\/physics-and-the-immortality-of-the-soul\/\">no life after death<\/a>!  Enjoy it while you&#8217;re around, folks.  An important message.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panel discussion starts:<\/strong> Forgot to mention that Paul Davies has shaved off his <a href=\"http:\/\/josepardina.files.wordpress.com\/2010\/08\/pauldavies1.jpg\">moustache<\/a>.  Disconcerting.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4 minutes:<\/strong> Also disconcerting: watching myself on TV. Hate it.  But I persevere for the greater good.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5 minutes:<\/strong> Here&#8217;s Michio Kaku, not saying very much.<\/p>\n<p><strong>7 minutes:<\/strong> Jennifer Wiseman and I were actually grad students together!  She&#8217;s good people, even if we disagree about the whole God thing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>9 minutes:<\/strong> I come out in favor of basing purpose and meaning on reality.  But I&#8217;m pretty sure a longer remark was cut off there.  Arrrrgh!  Nothing nefarious, we intentionally recorded a bit more than they had time to show.  But enormously frustrating that there was so little time.<\/p>\n<p><strong>13 minutes:<\/strong> Not sure why we kept talking about the multiverse.  Hawking didn&#8217;t bring it up, did he?<\/p>\n<p><strong>17 minutes:<\/strong> I thought a lot of what Haught said was not even really trying to argue in favor of God&#8217;s existence, but simply expressing a desire that he exist.  &#8220;God is the grounding of hope&#8221; isn&#8217;t evidence for God&#8217;s existence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>22 minutes:<\/strong> Haven&#8217;t said anything completely silly yet, so that&#8217;s good.  But so little time&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>27 minutes:<\/strong> Always time for more Michio!<\/p>\n<p><strong>30 minutes:<\/strong> Arrrrgh again, this time for real:  in the live conversation, I had the last word and it was a pretty good one.  In the televised program, not so much. Had to end wishy-washy.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for tuning in.  Wouldn&#8217;t it have been wonderful to have the time for a real conversation?  But big ups to Discovery for hosting the panel at all &#8212; it&#8217;s a rare event on TV.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tonight&#8217;s the premiere of Curiosity on the Discovery Channel, featuring Stephen Hawking talking about cosmology and God, followed by the &#8220;Curiosity Conversation&#8221; panel that I&#8217;m on along with David Gregory, Paul Davies, and John Haught. Hawking&#8217;s hour-long show is scheduled for 8pm Eastern\/5pm Pacific, and will then repeat 3 hours later (11E\/8P). Our half-hour panel [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,27,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-personal","category-religion","category-science-and-society"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7291\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}