{"id":6865,"date":"2011-05-30T15:26:14","date_gmt":"2011-05-30T22:26:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/?p=6865"},"modified":"2011-05-30T15:26:14","modified_gmt":"2011-05-30T22:26:14","slug":"anomaly-at-the-tevatron-might-be-something-real","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2011\/05\/30\/anomaly-at-the-tevatron-might-be-something-real\/","title":{"rendered":"Anomaly at the Tevatron Might Be Something Real?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Tevatron, Fermilab&#8217;s mighty but ancient (as these things go) particle accelerator, is <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2011\/01\/10\/the-end-of-the-tevatron\/\">scheduled to be shut down<\/a> at the end of this year.  But the old beast might have a trick or two left yet.<\/p>\n<p>Way back in April we talked about <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2011\/04\/06\/anomalies-at-fermilab\/\">a couple of lingering anomalies<\/a> in the Tevatron data that had risen to the level where theorists were intrigued enough to start building models.  One of these &#8212; a forward\/backward asymmetry in top-quark interactions &#8212; had been around for a while, and was taken seriously by a number of people.  The other &#8212; a tiny bump near 150 GeV in the total number of events that produce a W boson and two jets &#8212; was relatively new, and was greeted by a bit of scoffing.  The bump credibility took another hit when it was pointed out that it could be explained away by a simple (although completely hypothetical) systematic error &#8212; a <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2011\/04\/08\/science-is-hard\/\">miscalibration of the jet energies<\/a>.  <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2007\/01\/26\/bump-hunting-part-1\/\">Bump-hunting<\/a> is <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2007\/01\/26\/bump-huning-part-2\/\">hard<\/a>, and experiments near the end of their lifetimes are more willing to share their anomalies than they would be if they knew they were going to keep going, since there&#8217;s little hope that new data will solve the problem.<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s some hope.  The real reason to be patient rather than excited by the bump at 150 GeV was that it was a 3-sigma effect, in a game where most 3-sigma effects go away.  In particle physics, we generally take a solid 3-sigma result as &#8220;evidence for&#8221; something, and require 5 sigma &#8212; a much greater deviation from the expected numbers &#8212; to declare something a &#8220;discovery.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>More data are now in!  This is from the CDF experiment at Fermilab, as reported in <a href=\"http:\/\/blois.in2p3.fr\/2011\/transparencies\/punzi.pdf\">a conference talk by Giovanni Punzi<\/a> (pdf), and shared worldwide <a href=\"http:\/\/resonaances.blogspot.com\/2011\/05\/cdf-wjj-bump-is-almost-5-sigma.html\">by Jester at R\u00e9sonaances<\/a>.  There&#8217;s a reason why I mentioned R\u00e9sonaances among the physics blogs <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2011\/05\/30\/best-science-blogging-of-the-year\/\">above<\/a> &#8212; it&#8217;s unquestionably the go-to place for new results in particle physics.<\/p>\n<p>And the anomaly is now &#8212; almost five sigma!  It didn&#8217;t go away with more data, it became more prominent.  It would be very hard at this point to simply attribute it to an energy miscalibration or something like that; if it is a systematic error, it&#8217;s a subtle one.  But it doesn&#8217;t look like an error; it looks like a signal.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/resonaances.blogspot.com\/2011\/05\/cdf-wjj-bump-is-almost-5-sigma.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/files\/2011\/05\/CDF_Wjj_7fb.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"592\" height=\"534\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6866\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Of course, it&#8217;s still very possible that it will go away.  These things usually do.  But when an interesting result is pushing five sigma, it&#8217;s perfectly okay to get a bit excited and start wondering what&#8217;s going on.  One of the nice things about this bump is that it&#8217;s <em>not<\/em> very hard to come up with models that can explain it &#8212; all you need is a neutral boson, similar to the well-known <em>Z<\/em> boson of the weak interactions, with a mass near 150 GeV.  This kind of idea is so well-known in the trade that it already has a name &#8212; the <em>Z&#8217;<\/em> boson, imaginatively enough.<\/p>\n<p>Except it&#8217;s not <em>that<\/em> simple, of course &#8212; where would be the fun?  When you start mindlessly adding new particles to the Standard Model, you have to check consistency with all sorts of experimental constraints.  In particular, a naive <em>Z&#8217;<\/em> boson would sometimes decay into leptons as well as quarks (the jets mentioned above).  In that case, it would have been seen long ago in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Large_Electron%E2%80%93Positron_Collider\">LEP<\/a>, the electron-positron collider at CERN that previously lived in what is now the LHC&#8217;s tunnel.  So what you really need is a &#8220;leptophobic&#8221; <em>Z&#8217;<\/em>, one that decays into quarks but not into leptons.<\/p>\n<p>Or something along those lines, or something completely different.  See <a href=\"http:\/\/resonaances.blogspot.com\/2011\/05\/more-on-wjj-bump-in-cdf.html\">R\u00e9sonaances<\/a> once again for the lay of the theoretical land.  Yes, there are possible explanations within supersymmetry; and yes, there are explanations that have nothing to do with supersymmetry.<\/p>\n<p>If this is real &#8212; still a very, very, big if &#8212; it&#8217;s the beginning of the &#8220;beyond the Standard Model era&#8221; in collider particle physics.  Things aren&#8217;t going to snap into place overnight; there will be false starts, mysteries, and sudden epiphanies.  That&#8217;s where the real fun is in science.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Update:<\/strong>  Note that the very preliminary word from the LHC is that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quantumdiaries.org\/2011\/05\/31\/could-this-be-real\/\">they <em>don&#8217;t<\/em> yet see the same bump that CDF does<\/a>.  But from a glance at the figure it doesn&#8217;t look like they have nearly as much data yet, so that&#8217;s probably not surprising.  The LHC has seen incredible jumps in luminosity recently, however, so they should be able to do a proper check before too long.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Tevatron, Fermilab&#8217;s mighty but ancient (as these things go) particle accelerator, is scheduled to be shut down at the end of this year. But the old beast might have a trick or two left yet. Way back in April we talked about a couple of lingering anomalies in the Tevatron data that had risen [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6865\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}