{"id":6603,"date":"2011-04-06T10:47:18","date_gmt":"2011-04-06T17:47:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/?p=6603"},"modified":"2011-04-06T10:47:18","modified_gmt":"2011-04-06T17:47:18","slug":"anomalies-at-fermilab","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2011\/04\/06\/anomalies-at-fermilab\/","title":{"rendered":"Anomalies at Fermilab"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Tevatron accelerator at Fermilab is shutting down soon, for some unavoidable reasons (the LHC is taking over) and some frustrating ones (we&#8217;re out of money).  But there may be life in the old beast yet; a couple of intriguing anomalies have particle theorists raising their eyebrows in charmingly understated excitement.<\/p>\n<p>Two different anomalies are getting attention right now.  One, which has been around for a while but doesn&#8217;t seem to be going away, is a forward-backward asymmetry in top quark production.  Unlike the LHC, which just smashes protons together, the Tevatron has a proton beam and an antiproton beam.  Intriguingly, when collisions produce a top-antitop pair, they seem to be preferentially produced in the direction of the protons rather than the antiprotons.  If you want a popular-level account, here&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/view\/generic\/id\/72095\/title\/Remodeling_the_standard_model\">Ron Cowen at <em>Science News<\/em><\/a>, while <a href=\"http:\/\/resonaances.blogspot.com\/2011\/04\/update-on-forward-backward-asymmetry.html\">Jester gives you the technical details<\/a> at R\u00e9sonaances.  I&#8217;ll just show you a <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1102.3374\">pretty picture<\/a>; the horizontal axis is &#8220;forward&#8221; cross section, while the vertical axis is the &#8220;backward&#8221; cross section, both in units of the Standard Model expectation.  The center of the plot is where we should be, and as you can see we are just a bit off.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1102.3374\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/files\/2011\/04\/topasymmetry.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"488\" height=\"432\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6604\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>A completely different anomaly seems to have <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1104.0699\">just cropped up<\/a>, this time in collisions that produce a W boson as well as two &#8220;jets&#8221; (particle-physics speak for &#8220;bunches of particles typically associated with the production of strongly-interacting stuff).  Once again we have explanations in the MSM and on the blogs:  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/04\/06\/science\/06particle.html\">Dennis Overbye at the NYT<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.uslhc.us\/a-hint-of-something-new-in-wdijets-at-cdf\">Flip Tanedo at US LHC Blogs<\/a>.  What happens here is that you just measure how many events you see as a function of how much energy is in the jets.  Then you look for a &#8220;bump,&#8221; which as <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2007\/01\/26\/bump-hunting-part-1\/\">John has taught us<\/a> is often a signature of a new particle that has been produced and then quickly decayed.  Do you see the bump?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.uslhc.us\/a-hint-of-something-new-in-wdijets-at-cdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/files\/2011\/04\/allevents.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"480\" height=\"422\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6605\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><!--more-->The colorful histograms are the various expected Standard Model backgrounds, while the bars are the data.  The new bump is just to the right of the red peak labeled &#8220;WW+WZ.&#8221;  (This means that we produced one W boson, as well as another W or Z that decayed into two quarks that became jets.)  Not easy for the human eye to pick out, but if we subtract off everything but that red peak, here&#8217;s what we&#8217;re left with:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/pdf\/1104.0699v1\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/files\/2011\/04\/bump1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"451\" height=\"402\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6611\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>See it?  In case your eye needs guiding, the CDF collaboration has helpfully provided a version with a blue histogram representing something unknown and bumplike (i.e., that blue thing is not predicted by the Standard Model).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/pdf\/1104.0699v1\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/files\/2011\/04\/bump2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"453\" height=\"398\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6612\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>(Thanks to Michael in comments for pointing out the existence of the top version, which I didn&#8217;t notice at first, having just stolen the plot from Flip rather than directly from the paper.)  It&#8217;s a 3-sigma effect, which is where people begin to get excited, although <a href=\"http:\/\/xkcd.com\/882\/\">most 3-sigma effects go away<\/a>.  Probably this one will go away, but &#8230; you never know until it does, and you wouldn&#8217;t want to dismiss the possibility that it won&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>What could it be?  I&#8217;m not the one to ask.  It&#8217;s at 150 GeV, which is an interesting place to have new particles crop up.  It is <em>not<\/em> the ordinary Higgs boson &#8212; the bump is far too large.  I guess we&#8217;ll just wait and see; happily a giant particle accelerator in Geneva is collecting data as we speak.<\/p>\n<p>There is a <a href=\"http:\/\/vms-db-srv.fnal.gov\/fmi\/xsl\/VMS_Site_2\/000Return\/video\/r_live.xsl\">special seminar at Fermilab this afternoon<\/a> at 4:00 p.m. Central time to talk about the result.  Not sure if there will be anything there that isn&#8217;t in the <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1104.0699\">paper<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Tevatron accelerator at Fermilab is shutting down soon, for some unavoidable reasons (the LHC is taking over) and some frustrating ones (we&#8217;re out of money). But there may be life in the old beast yet; a couple of intriguing anomalies have particle theorists raising their eyebrows in charmingly understated excitement. Two different anomalies are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6603\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}