{"id":6599,"date":"2011-04-06T09:28:24","date_gmt":"2011-04-06T16:28:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/?p=6599"},"modified":"2011-04-06T09:28:24","modified_gmt":"2011-04-06T16:28:24","slug":"sir-martin-rees-wins-the-templeton-prize","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2011\/04\/06\/sir-martin-rees-wins-the-templeton-prize\/","title":{"rendered":"Sir Martin Rees Wins the Templeton Prize"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Templeton Prize has to be the most efficient publicity campaign ever.  The Templeton Foundation gives a million British pounds to a scientist who is willing to say that science and religion are compatible, and in return they get many times that value in publicity.  (The formal citation is &#8220;for making an exceptional contribution to investigating life&#8217;s spiritual dimension&#8221;)  Atheists should really just refuse to talk about it, but &#8212; can&#8217;t resist!<\/p>\n<p>This year&#8217;s winner is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/science\/2011\/apr\/06\/martin-rees-templeton-prize\">Sir Martin Rees<\/a>, one of the world&#8217;s leading theoretical astrophysicists.  Like everyone else, I have nothing but enormous respect for Sir Martin&#8217;s work.  He focuses mostly on &#8220;physical&#8221; cosmology &#8212; that part that involves actual known laws of physics, like galaxy formation &#8212; but is more willing than most folks in that game to think about speculative ideas concerning the multiverse and the Big Bang.  He describes himself as non-religious but church-going, and would rather science and religion just get along than be constantly at each other&#8217;s throats.  You can read an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/science\/2011\/apr\/06\/astronomer-royal-martin-rees-interview\">extremely awkward interview<\/a> with him by Ian Sample in the <em>Guardian<\/em> &#8212; it&#8217;s clear Rees has no interest at all in talking about science\/religion issues, but that&#8217;s going to come up when you win the Templeton prize.<\/p>\n<p>But the really telling thing is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/commentisfree\/belief\/2011\/apr\/06\/martin-rees-templeton-prize-god-wars?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487\">this companion piece<\/a> at the <em>Guardian<\/em>&#8216;s website by Mark Vernon.  (Another piece by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/science\/blog\/2011\/apr\/06\/prize-mug-martin-rees-templeton\">Jerry Coyne<\/a> provides some balance.)  The real problem with the Templeton Foundation, in my view, is that it works very hard to give people a false impression that science and religion are actually reconciling, not just that they should be.  If you want to see the publicity machine at work, this piece is a perfect example.  Here&#8217;s the money paragraph:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But with Rees&#8217;s acceptance, the substantial resources of the Templeton Foundation have, in effect, been welcomed at the heart of the British scientific establishment. That such a highly regarded figure has received its premier prize will make it that little bit harder for Dawkins to sustain respect amongst his peers for his crusade against religion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There you go &#8212; now that such a distinguished and respectable scientist has accepted the Templeton Prize, we may conclude that &#8220;the British scientific establishment&#8221; is rejecting Dawkins and his fellow noisome atheists in favor of warm and fuzzy Templetonianism.  That&#8217;s exactly the publicity effect they are hoping for.<\/p>\n<p>In unrelated news, Mark Vernon spent time at Cambridge in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.templeton-cambridge.org\/\">journalism fellowship paid for by the Templeton Foundation<\/a>.  Have to hand it to them, these guys know <a href=\"http:\/\/www.templeton-cambridge.org\/fellows\/great_issues_section.php?issue=1\">how to get a message out<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Templeton Prize has to be the most efficient publicity campaign ever. The Templeton Foundation gives a million British pounds to a scientist who is willing to say that science and religion are compatible, and in return they get many times that value in publicity. (The formal citation is &#8220;for making an exceptional contribution to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science-and-society"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6599"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6599\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}