{"id":1505,"date":"2007-11-30T15:27:25","date_gmt":"2007-11-30T20:27:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2007\/11\/30\/mike-huckabee-is-a-funny-guy\/"},"modified":"2007-11-30T15:27:25","modified_gmt":"2007-11-30T20:27:25","slug":"mike-huckabee-is-a-funny-guy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2007\/11\/30\/mike-huckabee-is-a-funny-guy\/","title":{"rendered":"Mike Huckabee is a Funny Guy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Former Arkansas governor <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Huckabee\">Mike Huckabee<\/a> is enjoying a late surge in the polls for the Republican nomination, especially in the crucial early caucus state of Iowa.  Part of his appeal is a sense of humor, as evidenced by this clever appropriation of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chucknorrisfacts.com\/\">Chuck Norris Facts<\/a> meme:<\/p>\n<p>Chuck Norris, in addition to his considerable thespian credentials, is a proud <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/news\/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52567\">creationist<\/a> who wants the Bible taught in public schools.  So it is not surprising to find Mike Huckabee <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2007\/06\/04\/it-does-matter-what-people-think-about-how-the-world-works\/\">denying the reality of evolution<\/a> during a televised debate.<\/p>\n<p>But this video, while also quite funny, is pretty scary.  Via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cynical-c.com\/?p=9140\">Cynical-C<\/a>, it&#8217;s a 2004 speech to the Republican Governors&#8217; Association.<\/p>\n<p>A phone call from God!  Quite the thigh-slapper.  Huckabee artfully includes an assurance that God doesn&#8217;t take side during elections &#8212; although we all know his preferences, apparently.<\/p>\n<p>I understand that it&#8217;s a joke.  But there are moments of solemnity during the &#8220;phone call,&#8221; when Huckabee is being perfectly serious.  One of those is at the 2:00 mark, where we are reminded that the President talks to God.  And then we receive a list of instructions, including &#8220;protecting marriage.&#8221;  (It needs to be protected from The Gays, for those who don&#8217;t have your decoder rings.)  George W. Bush himself has occasionally mentioned <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/13\/AR2005101301688.html\">talking to God<\/a>, although usually in private meetings where it&#8217;s difficult to get objective verification, and admittedly his theology is <a href=\"http:\/\/timesonline.typepad.com\/faith\/2007\/08\/top-50-bushisms.html\">somewhat unsystematic<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A lot of people who don&#8217;t really believe in the old-fashioned supernatural nevertheless think it&#8217;s a good idea to <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2007\/10\/20\/please-tell-me-what-god-means\/\">appropriate spiritual terminology<\/a> for their own uses &#8212; re-defining &#8220;faith&#8221; as &#8220;any hypothesis that has not yet been proven,&#8221; or &#8220;God&#8221; as &#8220;the warm feeling I get when contemplating the universe,&#8221; or &#8220;religion&#8221; as &#8220;a nice kind of social club that brings people together to reinforce each other&#8217;s goodness.&#8221;  It&#8217;s not a good idea.  These are words, and they have meanings when you say them &#8212; people think they know what you have in mind.  When you say &#8220;God,&#8221; most people think of the <a href=\"http:\/\/dictionary.reference.com\/search?db=*&amp;q=God\">dictionary definition<\/a> &#8212; &#8220;the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.&#8221;  They&#8217;re not thinking of &#8220;the laws of nature.&#8221;  And they honestly <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/pharyngula\/2007\/11\/viewing_religion_through_pangl.php\">believe<\/a> in this dictionary-definition God.  And they let that belief affect, or at least justify, how they govern the country.  Shouldn&#8217;t every non-religious person be deeply alarmed about this state of affairs?<\/p>\n<p>At the <a href=\"http:\/\/thesciencenetwork.org\/BeyondBelief2\/agenda\/\">Beyond Belief II<\/a> conference, Stuart Kauffman gave an interesting (although flawed, I thought) talk about complexity and reductionism, and then ruined the whole thing by suggesting at the end that we should re-define &#8220;the sacred&#8221; as something arising from the radical contingency of the empirical path of biological evolution.  Or something like that, it was a bit vague.  What an abysmally bad idea.  If you want to choose a word that refers to something other than the traditional religious conception of supreme beings and all that, then <em>don&#8217;t use religious language<\/em>.  Because there are other people out there &#8212; far vaster in number than you &#8212; that are using those same words to mean exactly what they straightforwardly denote:  a supernatural power with a vested interest in smiting the wicked, especially boys and girls who fall in love with boys and girls, respectively.   And they&#8217;re running this country at the moment, and their beliefs are enacted into policy.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, arguing with Mike Huckabee and his friends runs the risk that Chuck Norris will come along and kick your ass.  That&#8217;s just the chance we have to take.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee is enjoying a late surge in the polls for the Republican nomination, especially in the crucial early caucus state of Iowa. Part of his appeal is a sense of humor, as evidenced by this clever appropriation of the Chuck Norris Facts meme: Chuck Norris, in addition to his considerable thespian [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1505","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-religion"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1505","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1505"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1505\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1505"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1505"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1505"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}