{"id":12540,"date":"2015-07-17T08:30:26","date_gmt":"2015-07-17T15:30:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/?p=12540"},"modified":"2015-07-17T08:30:26","modified_gmt":"2015-07-17T15:30:26","slug":"yoichiro-nambu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2015\/07\/17\/yoichiro-nambu\/","title":{"rendered":"Yoichiro Nambu"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/content.time.com\/time\/specials\/packages\/article\/0,28804,1894410_1893209_1893461,00.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/yoichiro_nambu.jpg\" alt=\"yoichiro_nambu\" width=\"260\" height=\"410\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-12541\" srcset=\"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/yoichiro_nambu.jpg 260w, https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/yoichiro_nambu-190x300.jpg 190w, https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/yoichiro_nambu-95x150.jpg 95w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 260px) 100vw, 260px\" \/><\/a> It was very sad to hear yesterday that <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Yoichiro_Nambu\">Yoichiro Nambu<\/a> has died. He was aged 94, so it was after a <a href=\"http:\/\/the-japan-news.com\/news\/article\/0002294968\">very long and full life<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Nambu was one of the greatest theoretical physicists of the 20th century, although not one with a high public profile. Among his contributions:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Being the first to really understand <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Spontaneous_symmetry_breaking\">spontaneous symmetry breaking<\/a> in quantum field theory, work for which he won a (very belated) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/nobel_prizes\/physics\/laureates\/2008\/nambu-facts.html\">Nobel Prize in 2008<\/a>. We now understand the pion as a (pseudo-) &#8220;Nambu-Goldstone boson.&#8221;<\/li>\n<p><\/p>\n<li>Suggesting that quarks might come in three <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Quantum_chromodynamics\">colors<\/a>, and those colors might be charges for an SU(3) gauge symmetry, giving rise to force-carrying particles called gluons.<\/li>\n<p><\/p>\n<li>Proposing the first relativistic string theory, based on what is now called the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nambu%E2%80%93Goto_action\">Nambu-Goto action<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>So &#8212; not too shabby. <\/p>\n<p>But despite his outsized accomplishments, Nambu was quiet, proper, it&#8217;s even fair to say &#8220;shy.&#8221; He was one of those physicists who talked very little, and was often difficult to understand when he does talk, but if you put in the effort to follow him you would invariably be rewarded. One of his colleagues at the University of Chicago, Bruce Winstein, was charmed by the fact that Nambu was an experimentalist at heart; at home, apparently, he kept a little lab, where he would tinker with electronics to take a break from solving equations.<\/p>\n<p>Any young person in science might want to read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/profile-yoichiro-nambu\/\">this profile of Nambu<\/a> by his former student Madhusree Mukerjee. In it, Nambu tells of when he first came to the US from Japan, to be a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. &#8220;Everyone seemed smarter than I,&#8221; Nambu recalls. &#8220;I could not accomplish what I wanted to and had a nervous breakdown.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If Yoichiro Nambu can have a nervous breakdown because he didn&#8217;t feel smart enough, what hope is there for the rest of us?<\/p>\n<p>Here are a few paragraphs I wrote about Nambu and spontaneous symmetry breaking in <a href=\"http:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/particle\/\"><em>The Particle at the End of the Universe<\/em><\/a>.  <!--more--><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>A puzzle remained: how do we reconcile the idea that photons have mass inside a superconductor with the conviction that the underlying symmetry of electromagnetism forces the photon to be massless? <\/p>\n<p>This problem was tackled by a number of people, including American physicist Philip Anderson, Soviet physicist Nikolai Bogoliubov, and Japanese-American physicist Yoichiro Nambu. The key turned out to be that the symmetry was indeed there, but that it was hidden by a field with that took on a nonzero value in the superconductor. According to the jargon that accompanies this phenomenon, we say the symmetry is \u201cspontaneously broken\u201d: the symmetry is there in the underlying equations, but the particular solution to those equations in which we are interested doesn\u2019t look very symmetrical. <\/p>\n<p>Yoichiro Nambu, despite the fact that he won the Nobel Prize in 2008 and has garnered numerous other honors over the years, remains relatively unknown outside physics. That\u2019s a shame, as his contributions are comparable to those of better-known colleagues. Not only was he one of the first to understand spontaneous symmetry breaking in particle physics, but he was also the first to propose that quarks carry color, to suggest the existence of gluons, and to point out that certain particle properties could be explained by imagining that the particles were really tiny strings, thus launching string theory. Theoretical physicists admire Nambu\u2019s accomplishments, but his inclination is to avoid the limelight. <\/p>\n<p>For several years in the early 2000\u2019s I was a faculty member at the University of Chicago, with an office across the hall from Nambu\u2019s. We didn\u2019t interact much, but when we did he was unfailingly gracious and polite. My major encounter with him was one time when he knocked on my door, hoping that I could help him with the email system on the theory group computers, which tended to take time off at unpredictable intervals. I wasn\u2019t much help, but he took it philosophically. Peter Freund, another theorist at Chicago, describes Nambu as a \u201cmagician\u201d: \u201cHe suddenly pulls a whole array of rabbits out of his hat and, before you know it, the rabbits reassemble in an entirely novel formation and by God, they balance the impossible on their fluffy cottontails.\u201d His highly developed sense of etiquette, however, failed him when he was briefly appointed as department chair: reluctant to explicitly say \u201cno\u201d to any question, he would indicate disapproval by pausing before saying \u201cyes.\u201d This led to a certain amount of consternation among his colleagues, once they realized that their requests hadn\u2019t actually been granted. <\/p>\n<p>After the BCS theory of superconductivity was proposed, Nambu began to study the phenomenon from the perspective of a particle physicist. He put his finger on the key role played by spontaneous symmetry breaking, and began to wonder about its wider applicability.  One of Nambu\u2019s breakthroughs was to show (partly in collaboration with Italian physicist Giovanni Jona-Lasinio) how spontaneous symmetry breaking could happen even if you weren\u2019t inside a superconductor. It could happen in empty space, in the presence of a field with a nonzero value \u2014 a clear precursor to the Higgs field. Interestingly, this theory also showed how a fermion field could start out massless, but gain mass through the process of symmetry breaking.<\/p>\n<p>As brilliant as it was, Nambu\u2019s suggestion of spontaneous symmetry breaking came with a price. While his models gave masses to fermions, they also predicted a new massless boson particle \u2014 exactly what particle physicists were trying to avoid, since they didn\u2019t see any such particles created by the nuclear forces. Soon thereafter, Scottish physicist Jeffrey Goldstone argued that this wasn\u2019t just an annoyance: this kind of symmetry breaking necessarily gave rise to massless particles, now called \u201cNambu-Goldstone bosons.\u201d Pakistani physicist Abdus Salam and American physicist Steven Weinberg then collaborated with Goldstone in promoting this argument to what seemed like an air-tight proof, now called \u201cGoldstone&#8217;s theorem.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>One question that must be addressed by any theory of broken symmetry is, what is the field that breaks the symmetry? In a superconductor the role is played by the Cooper pairs, composite states of electrons. In the Nambu\/Jona-Lasinio model, a similar effect happens with composite nucleons. Starting with Goldstone\u2019s 1961 paper, however, physicists become comfortable with the idea of simply positing a set of new fundamental boson fields whose job it was to break symmetries by taking on a nonzero value in empty space. The kind of fields required are known as a \u201cscalar\u201d fields, which is a way of saying they have no intrinsic spin. The gauge fields that carry forces, although they are also bosons, have spin equal to one.<\/p>\n<p>If the symmetry weren\u2019t broken, all the fields in Goldstone\u2019s model would behave in exactly the same way, as massive scalar bosons, due to the requirements of the symmetry. When the symmetry is broken, the fields differentiate themselves. In the case of a global symmetry (a single transformation all throughout space), which is what Goldstone considered, one field remains massive, while the others become massless Nambu-Goldstone bosons \u2014 that\u2019s Goldstone&#8217;s theorem. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It was very sad to hear yesterday that Yoichiro Nambu has died. He was aged 94, so it was after a very long and full life. Nambu was one of the greatest theoretical physicists of the 20th century, although not one with a high public profile. Among his contributions: Being the first to really understand [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12540"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12540\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12544,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12540\/revisions\/12544"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}