{"id":12295,"date":"2014-12-12T09:59:55","date_gmt":"2014-12-12T17:59:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/?p=12295"},"modified":"2014-12-12T09:59:55","modified_gmt":"2014-12-12T17:59:55","slug":"where-have-we-tested-gravity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2014\/12\/12\/where-have-we-tested-gravity\/","title":{"rendered":"Where Have We Tested Gravity?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>General relativity is a rich theory that makes a wide variety of experimental predictions. It&#8217;s been tested many ways, and always seems to <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1403.7377\">pass with flying colors<\/a>. But there&#8217;s always the possibility that a different test in a new regime will reveal some anomalous behavior, which would open the door to a revolution in our understanding of gravity. (I didn&#8217;t say it was a likely possibility, but you don&#8217;t know until you try.)<\/p>\n<p>Not every experiment tests different things; sometimes one set of observations is done with a novel technique, but is actually just re-examining a physical regime that has already been well-explored. So it&#8217;s interesting to have a handle on what regimes we have already tested. For GR, that&#8217;s not such an easy question; it&#8217;s difficult to compare tests like gravitational redshift, the binary pulsar, and <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/astro-ph\/0108002\">Big Bang nucleosynthesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So it&#8217;s good to see a new paper that at least takes a stab at putting it all together:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1412.3455\">Linking Tests of Gravity On All Scales: from the Strong-Field Regime to Cosmology<\/a><br \/>\nTessa Baker, Dimitrios Psaltis, Constantinos Skordis<\/p>\n<p>The current effort to test General Relativity employs multiple disparate formalisms for different observables, obscuring the relations between laboratory, astrophysical and cosmological constraints. To remedy this situation, we develop a parameter space for comparing tests of gravity on all scales in the universe. In particular, we present new methods for linking cosmological large-scale structure, the Cosmic Microwave Background and gravitational waves with classic PPN tests of gravity. Diagrams of this gravitational parameter space reveal a noticeable untested regime. The untested window, which separates small-scale systems from the troubled cosmological regime, could potentially hide the onset of corrections to General Relativity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The idea is to find a simple way of characterizing different tests of GR so that they can be directly compared. This will always be something of an art as well as a science &#8212; the metric tensor has ten independent parameters (six of which are physical, given four coordinates we can choose), and there are a lot of ways they can combine together, so there&#8217;s little hope of a parameterization that is both easy to grasp and covers all bases.<\/p>\n<p>Still, you can make some reasonable assumptions and see whether you make progress. Baker <em>et al.<\/em> have defined two parameters: the &#8220;Potential&#8221; &epsilon;, which roughly tells you how deep the gravitational well is, and the &#8220;Curvature&#8221; &xi;, which tells you how strongly the field is changing through space. Again &#8212; these are reasonable things to look at, but not really comprehensive. Nevertheless, you can make a nice plot that shows where different experimental constraints lie in your new parameter space.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1412.3455\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/baker-etal.jpeg\" alt=\"baker-etal\" width=\"576\" height=\"616\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-12296\" srcset=\"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/baker-etal.jpeg 576w, https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/baker-etal-280x300.jpeg 280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 576px) 100vw, 576px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The nice thing is that there&#8217;s a lot of parameter space that is unexplored! You can think of this plot as a finding chart for experimenters who want to dream up new ways to test our best understanding of gravity in new regimes.<\/p>\n<p>One caveat: it would be extremely surprising indeed if gravity didn&#8217;t conform to GR in these regimes. The philosophy of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2013\/06\/20\/how-quantum-field-theory-becomes-effective\/\">effective field theory<\/a> gives us a very definite expectation for where our theories should break down: on length scales <em>shorter<\/em> than where we have tested the theory. It would be weird, although certainly not impossible, for a theory of gravity to work with exquisite precision in our Solar System, but break down on the scales of galaxies or cosmology. It&#8217;s not impossible, but that fact should weigh heavily in one&#8217;s personal Bayesian priors for finding new physics in this kind of regime. Just another way that Nature makes life challenging for we poor human physicists.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>General relativity is a rich theory that makes a wide variety of experimental predictions. It&#8217;s been tested many ways, and always seems to pass with flying colors. But there&#8217;s always the possibility that a different test in a new regime will reveal some anomalous behavior, which would open the door to a revolution in our [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arxiv","category-science"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12295"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12295\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12297,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12295\/revisions\/12297"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}