Miscellany

Deep Thoughts on the Internets

A few links to interesting things before I hop on an airplane:

  • We’ve talked before (well, Anthony Aguirre talked for us) about the Foundational Questions Institute, an organization devoted to supporting work on, how should we put it, foundational questions in the physical sciences. I was originally a little leery about the whole operation, but have since been convinced that FQXi is a respecable and independent organization, even if the acronym continues to baffle me. I’ve even become a member, although I’m still working out what that means.

    Now they’ve launched a new community site, which looks interesting. There are feature articles, news items, forums, and blogs. We’re talking serious Foundational Questioning 2.0 here. Have a look.

  • Stuart Coleman at Daily Irreverence will soon be hosting Philosophia Naturalis, the physical-sciences blog carnival. If you’ve written or read something great along those lines recently, be sure to send him a line to have it included.
  • David Harris at symmetry writes to let us know that they’re compiling a Particle Physics Life List, and need good suggestions. That is to say, they want a list of the 101 particle-physics-oriented things that everyone should do once in their life. I would have suggested “enjoy a buffalo burger at a Fermilab barbeque,” but they’ve already included “see one of Fermilab’s newborn baby buffalo,” and there’s some tension there. Cycle of life and all that, however.

Deep Thoughts on the Internets Read More »

14 Comments

Nuggets

Things to gawk at on the internets:

  • Remember the String Kings? Then you’ll love the Director’s Cut, brought to you by Steven Miller.
  • Remember that the cell is like Tron? There’s a Director’s Cut of the Inner Life of a Cell video as well, with commentary and all that. (Thanks to many people for letting me know.)
  • Construct a Heptadecagon with nought but compass and straightedge! That’s a seventeen-sided polygon, for those of you keeping score at home. Wikipedia shows you how. Heptadecagon

Nuggets Read More »

9 Comments

Mapping Skid Row’s Homeless

Downtown Los Angeles is in the midst of a renaissance. (Partly because I live there, but I can’t claim all the credit.) Amidst the high-rises and cultural institutions, residential building is booming, bringing restaurants and nightlife along with it. But the vibrant core of Downtown is just a few blocks from the epicenter of homelessness in LA: Skid Row. This compact area (official six square blocks) is a magnet for poverty and dispossession, and intentionally so: the city has concentrated services for the homeless near Skid Row, in an attempt to provide relatively easy access for the city’s itinerant population. But the neighborhood is by no means a pretty sight: the vision of small tents and ratty cardboard boxes stretching along the streets is an indelible one. And reports continue of local hospitals and mental-health clinics simply giving up on their worst cases and dumping them on Skid Row to fend for themselves.

Ideally, you don’t want to contain homelessness in a tiny area, you want to eradicate it completely. (The condition, not the people who suffer from it.) One step toward that goal is a better understanding of actual conditions in the region: who the homeless are, how many of them are on the streets, how they live and move through the city. Eric Richardson, who writes the excellent blogdowntown covering everything about Downtown LA, as part of his day job at Cartifact has been working to map Skid Row’s homeless population. (Cartifact is also responsible for an interesting interactive map of Downtown.)

Skid Row Homeless Map

It’s an impressive project, described here, and the most recent update has just come out. The data come from regular counts undertaken by the LAPD; systematic uncertainties will, of course, be as much of an issue here as in any data-collecting process. By clicking on the lower left corner, you can see the maps change as a function of time, or run through an animation of all the maps for the last several months. The good news is that the most recent count is the lowest yet; this is much more likely to represent a seasonal fluctuation than a long-term trend, but it’s still heartening to see.

Mapping Skid Row’s Homeless Read More »

9 Comments

I prefer to read. Leave me alone.

A whole life of making minimal demands, of keeping to myself, of doing all my chores promptly and well, of getting superlative grades, of being a star in band, of being a dutiful student of the piano, of having good and well-behaved friends, of working ever since I was old enough to drive — that all meant nothing. Being good hadn’t preserved me from random interrogations, in fact made me more vulnerable — I bought into their standard of judgment and tried to defend myself according to it, once even breaking down in tears, a seventeen-year-old kid, breaking down into incoherence, collapsing into a fetal position, and she just walked away. Even now, if something ever comes up in conversation, she acts like she doesn’t remember, like it was someone else entirely — she apologizes on behalf of this other person, over-eagerly, like she’s apologizing for some weird misunderstanding that she can’t fully assimilate.

Dave Brubeck and Heidegger. Adam Kotsko tells a short cliched-sounding tale — growing up with parents who don’t understand you — that he elevates into a moving memoir. I’m glad to have been quite a bit more fortunate.

I prefer to read. Leave me alone. Read More »

4 Comments

Conservapedia

Everyone is having their fun with Conservapedia, a rightward-tilting alternative to Wikipedia that aims to ensure that future generations of conservatives grow up really dumb. A mildly-close look reveals that the major biases of Wikipedia that made this new project worth launching are (1) their insistence in using “CE” (Common Era) rather than “AD” (Anno Domini) in giving dates, and (2) the occasional Anglicized spelling. For some great examples of the way self-professed conservatives view the world, see Jon Swift, or a roundup of sciencey responses by Mark Chu-Carroll.

Here are my personal favorites, after five minutes of clicking around. Links to specific versions, as they keep changing, of course. But these look sincere, not the result of vandalism by naughty liberals!

  • Atheism
    Atheism is the disbelief in the existence of any supernatural deity. This disbelief can take a number of forms, such as the assertion that deities do not exist, or the absence of any belief in any deity.

    Stalin and Richard Dawkins are prominent atheists. Dawkins wrote a book, called “The God Delusion”. Stalin is now dead, having killed millions of people in the name of Marxis-Leninism (which is predicated on atheism).

    Since atheists have no God, as a philosophical framework atheism simply provides no logical basis for any moral standard. They live their lives according to the rule that “anything goes”. In recent years, this has led to a large rise in crime[1], drug use, pre-marital sex, teenage pregnancy,[2] pedophilia[3] and bestiality.

The road from atheism to bestiality is shorter than you think!

  • Stalin
    Josef Stalin was an atheist communist Russian dictator during World War II. He was defeated by Adolf Hitler, despite Hitler also being an atheist.

That’s the entire entry. I can’t decide which is more amusing — the amazement that one atheist could defeat another in battle, or the judgment that Hitler defeated Stalin.

  • Albert Einstein
    Einstein’s work had nothing to do with the development of the atomic bomb. Nothing useful has even been built based on the theory of relativity. Only one Nobel Prize (in 1993 and not to Einstein) has ever been given that even remotely relates to the theory of relativity. Many things predicted by the theory of relativity, such as gravitons, have never been found despite much searching for them. Many observed phenomenon, such as the bending of light passing near the sun or the advance of the perihelion in the orbit of Mercury, can be also predicted by Newton’s theory.

Can’t make this stuff up.

  • Anything Goes
    “Anything Goes” is the title of a 1934 musical production written by Cole Porter. Popular songs from the musical include “You’re the Top,” “I Get a Kick Out of You,” and “Anything Goes.”

    Because Porter was a homosexual, we can conclude that ‘anything goes’ was also his philosophy of life. Many atheists have adopted the song as a description of their “moral” code.

Getting the message yet?

  • Sex
    1. The process by which offspring are conceived.
    2. Another term for gender.

Again, that’s the entire entry. But it says so much, don’t you think?

Conservapedia Read More »

75 Comments

None, I Think, Do There Embrace

Archaeologists from Valdaro, Italy, have unearthed a pair of skeletons — a couple who died young, and have been hugging for the last five thousand years. Take that, Andrew Marvell!

Skeleton Hug

Commentators were unsure of many of the basic facts about the Neolithic couple — whether they died simultaneously or one followed the other, whether it was a sudden accident or a ritual sacrifice, or even whether they are man and woman or a same-sex couple.

Opinion is unanimous, however, that they are awfully cute.

None, I Think, Do There Embrace Read More »

29 Comments

Sponsored Links

One of the fun aspects of using Gmail is the little ads for sponsored links that appear next to every message. I can’t imagine ever clicking on one of them, but it’s amusing to see what the Google mind thinks is related to the message content. For the most recent daily mailing from gr-qc@arxiv.org, here were the sponsored links that came along with it:

Fields Medal declined
Grigori Perelman has declined the 2006 Fields Medal for mathematics
www.thefirstpost.co.uk

the field center
how consciousness creates reality; an extraordinary eight-week course.
www.fieldcenter.org

The Theory of Everything
String theory can’t be all there is Read all about the alternatives
NewPhysicsAndTheMind.net

field offices ny
Perfect sales office space in NYC. $495+, full service. Start now!
www.microoffice.us

Relativity Challenge
Did Einstein make a math mistake? You be the judge!
www.relativitychallenge.com

Wanted: Scientists
Jobs for PhDs in biology, chemistry physics, math, and engineering
jobs.phds.org

Humidifier Filters
All sizes all the time 24 hour shipping
www.filters-now.com

So the scorecard is: two relevant links, three crackpot sites, one hilariously inappropriate understanding of the word “field,” and one perplexing sales pitch for humidifiers. But I kind of like the idea of attacking string theory via Google ads. I might just start advertising my own papers this way.

Sponsored Links Read More »

6 Comments

Merry

Happy Quasi-Religious but Mostly-Secular Holiday with Pagan Origins, everybody! We’ll be back with our regularly scheduled hardnosed blogging — and a numerological milestone! — come Boxing Day.

Merry Read More »

31 Comments

What Economists Agree Upon

Study by Robert Whaples, summarized by Greg Mankiw:

  • 90.1 percent disagree with the position that “the U.S. should restrict employers from outsourcing work to foreign countries.”
  • 87.5 percent agree that “the U.S. should eliminate remaining tariffs and other barriers to trade.”
  • 85.2 percent agree that “the U.S. should eliminate agricultural subsidies.”
  • 85.3 percent agree that “the gap between Social Security funds and expenditures will become unsustainably large within the next fifty years if current policies remain unchanged.”
  • 77.2 percent agree that “the best way to deal with Social Security’s long-term funding gap is to increase the normal retirement age.”
  • 67.1 percent agree that “parents should be given educational vouchers which can be used at government-run or privately-run schools.”
  • 65.0 percent agree that “the U.S. should increase energy taxes.”

They like the free market, don’t they? Well, so do I. I basically agree with all of them except the bit about school vouchers — I even willing to be convinced about that, but the data so far seem to speak strongly against the success of vouchers (as I vaguely recall). The incentive structures don’t really point in the right direction. From the table, note that the above answers lump together “agree” and “strongly agree”; in fact, when it comes to vouchers, the agreement is not strong.

If you disagree with the economists, here’s why. All via Marginal Revolution.

What Economists Agree Upon Read More »

28 Comments
Scroll to Top