Memorial Day
A single casket creates a more moving image than dozens, or thousands. This was somebody’s son or daughter, brother or sister, perhaps father or mother.
A single casket creates a more moving image than dozens, or thousands. This was somebody’s son or daughter, brother or sister, perhaps father or mother.
A few links to interesting things before I hop on an airplane:
Now they’ve launched a new community site, which looks interesting. There are feature articles, news items, forums, and blogs. We’re talking serious Foundational Questioning 2.0 here. Have a look.
Deep Thoughts on the Internets Read More »
Things to gawk at on the internets:
Downtown Los Angeles is in the midst of a renaissance. (Partly because I live there, but I can’t claim all the credit.) Amidst the high-rises and cultural institutions, residential building is booming, bringing restaurants and nightlife along with it. But the vibrant core of Downtown is just a few blocks from the epicenter of homelessness in LA: Skid Row. This compact area (official six square blocks) is a magnet for poverty and dispossession, and intentionally so: the city has concentrated services for the homeless near Skid Row, in an attempt to provide relatively easy access for the city’s itinerant population. But the neighborhood is by no means a pretty sight: the vision of small tents and ratty cardboard boxes stretching along the streets is an indelible one. And reports continue of local hospitals and mental-health clinics simply giving up on their worst cases and dumping them on Skid Row to fend for themselves.
Ideally, you don’t want to contain homelessness in a tiny area, you want to eradicate it completely. (The condition, not the people who suffer from it.) One step toward that goal is a better understanding of actual conditions in the region: who the homeless are, how many of them are on the streets, how they live and move through the city. Eric Richardson, who writes the excellent blogdowntown covering everything about Downtown LA, as part of his day job at Cartifact has been working to map Skid Row’s homeless population. (Cartifact is also responsible for an interesting interactive map of Downtown.)
It’s an impressive project, described here, and the most recent update has just come out. The data come from regular counts undertaken by the LAPD; systematic uncertainties will, of course, be as much of an issue here as in any data-collecting process. By clicking on the lower left corner, you can see the maps change as a function of time, or run through an animation of all the maps for the last several months. The good news is that the most recent count is the lowest yet; this is much more likely to represent a seasonal fluctuation than a long-term trend, but it’s still heartening to see.
Mapping Skid Row’s Homeless Read More »
A whole life of making minimal demands, of keeping to myself, of doing all my chores promptly and well, of getting superlative grades, of being a star in band, of being a dutiful student of the piano, of having good and well-behaved friends, of working ever since I was old enough to drive — that all meant nothing. Being good hadn’t preserved me from random interrogations, in fact made me more vulnerable — I bought into their standard of judgment and tried to defend myself according to it, once even breaking down in tears, a seventeen-year-old kid, breaking down into incoherence, collapsing into a fetal position, and she just walked away. Even now, if something ever comes up in conversation, she acts like she doesn’t remember, like it was someone else entirely — she apologizes on behalf of this other person, over-eagerly, like she’s apologizing for some weird misunderstanding that she can’t fully assimilate.
Dave Brubeck and Heidegger. Adam Kotsko tells a short cliched-sounding tale — growing up with parents who don’t understand you — that he elevates into a moving memoir. I’m glad to have been quite a bit more fortunate.
I prefer to read. Leave me alone. Read More »
Everyone is having their fun with Conservapedia, a rightward-tilting alternative to Wikipedia that aims to ensure that future generations of conservatives grow up really dumb. A mildly-close look reveals that the major biases of Wikipedia that made this new project worth launching are (1) their insistence in using “CE” (Common Era) rather than “AD” (Anno Domini) in giving dates, and (2) the occasional Anglicized spelling. For some great examples of the way self-professed conservatives view the world, see Jon Swift, or a roundup of sciencey responses by Mark Chu-Carroll.
Here are my personal favorites, after five minutes of clicking around. Links to specific versions, as they keep changing, of course. But these look sincere, not the result of vandalism by naughty liberals!
Stalin and Richard Dawkins are prominent atheists. Dawkins wrote a book, called “The God Delusion”. Stalin is now dead, having killed millions of people in the name of Marxis-Leninism (which is predicated on atheism).
Since atheists have no God, as a philosophical framework atheism simply provides no logical basis for any moral standard. They live their lives according to the rule that “anything goes”. In recent years, this has led to a large rise in crime[1], drug use, pre-marital sex, teenage pregnancy,[2] pedophilia[3] and bestiality.
The road from atheism to bestiality is shorter than you think!
That’s the entire entry. I can’t decide which is more amusing — the amazement that one atheist could defeat another in battle, or the judgment that Hitler defeated Stalin.
Can’t make this stuff up.
Because Porter was a homosexual, we can conclude that ‘anything goes’ was also his philosophy of life. Many atheists have adopted the song as a description of their “moral” code.
Getting the message yet?
Again, that’s the entire entry. But it says so much, don’t you think?
Archaeologists from Valdaro, Italy, have unearthed a pair of skeletons — a couple who died young, and have been hugging for the last five thousand years. Take that, Andrew Marvell!
Commentators were unsure of many of the basic facts about the Neolithic couple — whether they died simultaneously or one followed the other, whether it was a sudden accident or a ritual sacrifice, or even whether they are man and woman or a same-sex couple.
Opinion is unanimous, however, that they are awfully cute.
None, I Think, Do There Embrace Read More »
One of the fun aspects of using Gmail is the little ads for sponsored links that appear next to every message. I can’t imagine ever clicking on one of them, but it’s amusing to see what the Google mind thinks is related to the message content. For the most recent daily mailing from gr-qc@arxiv.org, here were the sponsored links that came along with it:
Fields Medal declined
Grigori Perelman has declined the 2006 Fields Medal for mathematics
www.thefirstpost.co.ukthe field center
how consciousness creates reality; an extraordinary eight-week course.
www.fieldcenter.orgThe Theory of Everything
String theory can’t be all there is Read all about the alternatives
NewPhysicsAndTheMind.netfield offices ny
Perfect sales office space in NYC. $495+, full service. Start now!
www.microoffice.usRelativity Challenge
Did Einstein make a math mistake? You be the judge!
www.relativitychallenge.comWanted: Scientists
Jobs for PhDs in biology, chemistry physics, math, and engineering
jobs.phds.orgHumidifier Filters
All sizes all the time 24 hour shipping
www.filters-now.com
So the scorecard is: two relevant links, three crackpot sites, one hilariously inappropriate understanding of the word “field,” and one perplexing sales pitch for humidifiers. But I kind of like the idea of attacking string theory via Google ads. I might just start advertising my own papers this way.
Happy Quasi-Religious but Mostly-Secular Holiday with Pagan Origins, everybody! We’ll be back with our regularly scheduled hardnosed blogging — and a numerological milestone! — come Boxing Day.
Study by Robert Whaples, summarized by Greg Mankiw:
They like the free market, don’t they? Well, so do I. I basically agree with all of them except the bit about school vouchers — I even willing to be convinced about that, but the data so far seem to speak strongly against the success of vouchers (as I vaguely recall). The incentive structures don’t really point in the right direction. From the table, note that the above answers lump together “agree” and “strongly agree”; in fact, when it comes to vouchers, the agreement is not strong.
If you disagree with the economists, here’s why. All via Marginal Revolution.
What Economists Agree Upon Read More »