Here’s an interesting paper from yesterday’s hep-th batch of abstracts. One of the exciting prospects in observational cosmology over the next several years is finding signals of gravitational waves in the cosmic microwave background. These can be produced by inflation, and indeed simple models (one scalar field, no funny tricks) predict a “consistency relation” between characteristics of ordinary density perturbations and the gravitational waves. If signatures of the waves were detected (typically, by finding “tensor modes” in CMB polarization) and shown to be consistent with the simple prediction, it would be a huge boost for inflation.
The world isn’t always so simple, of course. It’s not too hard to think of models that violate the consistency relation. Now Senatore, Silverstein, and Zaldarriaga are pointing to a new mechanism: gravitational waves produced directly by particle or string sources during inflation. (Silverstein is of course well-known as a string theorist, but her recent work in early-universe cosmology has been as good as anybody’s in the field.) The usual mechanism is simply quantum fluctuations of fields in their vacuum state; these folks are imagining that particular objects — particles or strings — are produced during inflation, which then act as sources for gravitational waves. In a simple model you would expect that this effect might be important at a fixed scale corresponding to the energy of the sources, but they argue that it’s not hard to come up with models where gravitational waves are produced at all scales.
New Sources of Gravitational Waves during Inflation
Leonardo Senatore, Eva Silverstein, Matias Zaldarriaga
We point out that detectable inflationary tensor modes can be generated by particle or string sources produced during inflation, consistently with the requirements for inflation and constraints from scalar fluctuations. We show via examples that this effect can dominate over the contribution from quantum fluctuations of the metric, occurring even when the inflationary potential energy is too low to produce a comparable signal. Thus a detection of tensor modes from inflation does not automatically constitute a determination of the inflationary Hubble scale.
The bad news here is in the last line — in simple models (there’s that word again) the amplitude of gravitational waves is simply proportional to the expansion rate of the universe during inflation. Now that’s no longer so obvious. But research isn’t about finding good news or bad news, it’s about finding the right answer. Being unreasonably confident in the predictions we make from our models is just as dangerous as not having compelling models at all.
It might be worth mentioning that a very similar calculation was posted just a few days ago, by Cook and Sorbo:
J.~L.~Cook, L.~Sorbo,
“Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves detectable by ground-based interferometers,”
[arXiv:1109.0022 [astro-ph.CO]].
“Being unreasonably confident in the predictions we make from our models is just as dangerous as not having compelling models at all.”
True, but much better than having no practically testable predictions at all, eh?
And until “compelling models” can make practically testable predictions that cannot be “adjusted” as needed, or conveniently ignored when problematic, they are just so much hot air.
Firstly, a good point was made by Reference. The Silverstein group was clearly scooped on this one (so its a bit of a shame that Sean ignored the Cook and Sorbo paper, only to talk about the paper by the more “famous” group).
Secondly, without particle production, its generally true that the amplitude of gravity waves is set by the Hubble scale during inflation (its just due to the de Sitter temperature T=H/(2*pi) causing fluctuations in the metric, not just in “simple models” as Sean is claiming).
Thirdly, the basic idea that gravity waves from the early universe may not tell us the details about inflation was made much earlier in a much more dramatic example in http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0778, where Smith, Krauss, and Mathur point out that even a global phase transition can reproduce the same kind of amplitude and spectrum of gravity waves. This is a much more startling conclusion than the Cook and Sorbo result or the above result, since it can occur after inflation or even if there is no inflation at all!
If you don’t like it, then YOU can go solve third order non-linear differential equations!
@Fred — see this paper by Baumann and Zaldarriaga: http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.0958
They show that a measurement of the real space correlation function might enable a distinction to be made between “causal” sources of CMB B-modes (here the authors take “causal” to mean non-inflationary sources, so cosmic strings, phase transitions, etc fall into this category) and inflationary sources.
Wow, I read the article and the comments. My brain is shredded.
Pingback: Great Questions Regarding What's The Difference | Turbo Business Pro