The Truth Laid Bear has an “ecosystem” to rank blogs, using both inbound links and traffic as indicators of popularity. Here’s the top ten as of this afternoon:
Higher Beings
1. Daily Kos: State of the Nation (6587) details
2. Michelle Malkin (4935) details
3. Instapundit.com (4928) details
4. Cosmic Variance (4863) details
5. Tricia’s Musings (4712) details
6. lgf: helping moonbats sleep soundly (3906) details
7. Boing Boing (3762) details
8. Talking Points Memo (3314) details
9. Power Line (3041) details
10. Wanderlust Sha (3027) details
Okay, there seems to be a bug somewhere; we’re not really the fourth-largest blog on the Internets, by any plausible way of counting. Unless they are counting by awesomeness. But then we would have Instapundit and Malkin beat handily.
Awesome is about right. First port of call for me.
Un-drama blogging except when John lifts the lid on his culinary problems 🙂
Excuse OT Sean, but are you still accepting cosmology type questions on a very ancient thread I remember seeing? I have a couple to add, or can I just plonk ’em in here?
Flattery is a good start. What are the questions?
I think we should all take it as a positive sign that there is such a quantifiable interest in this arena. I think there is something fundamental (no pun intended) in the desire to ask and possibly answer the “large” questions and that is why I believe people visit, participate, lurk, and learn here.
e.
Cosmic Variance and Bad Astronomy are tied as my favorite blog.
The list seems totally random.
I find it very surprising that such a bias and often, factually incorrect, blog like Daily Kos would be number one.
I’m a little worried that Michele Malkin = Cosmic Variance to within sqrt(N). I don’t think the Theory of Everything explains this, although perhaps Malkin is your supersymmetric partner.
Totally awesome you were before bragging about being associated with THOSE blogs. May have to rethink the bookmark.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you’re ranked 4768 at
http://technorati.com/pop/blogs
Maybe these blogging rankings are (no!!) [b]unscientific[/b]
Wow! You guys beat boing boing!! Wicked….
Sean wrote (#2):
>
> Flattery is a good start. What are the questions?
While astromcnaught is getting his/her questions ready, I have a quick one if I may. I’d like to get a clear intuitive grasp of why a black hole colder than the ambient space doesn’t simply absorb energy and grow larger, as one might naively expect from the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
I’m guessing it’s something to do with relativity, and the frequency shifts of distant radiation as one approaches the event horizon, so that perhaps it does absorb some ambient energy but then emits more Bekenstein-Hawking radiation so the total emitted energy, over all wavelengths, is positive.
P.S. There’s no hidden agenda here or underlying challenge or any weird nonsense like that. I’m genuinely unsure and just want to get the facts straight.
Just a sound reference would be great (and I’m not scared of a few “sums” either!)
Unrelated; but a good article about hypocrisy
http://www.newcomensengine.com/2008/03/googleganda.html
I’m guessing they just couldn’t figure out how to spell Pharyngula.
It really was just a bug, people! We are not the fourth-biggest blog, or anywhere close.
John, that’s an easy one — a black hole with a temperature lower than its surroundings certainly will absorb radiation and grow in mass. It would only start losing mass once the energy it was losing via Hawking radiation was larger than what it was taking in.
Well it was only 3 digits out, 6, 7 and 8 😉
http://technorati.com/blogs/cosmicvariance.com
I’m not sure how accurate technorati ratings are, but at least your 4678 ranking beats Distler’s 2,124,856 place !
http://www.technorati.com/blogs/golem.ph.utexas.edu%2F%7Edistler%2Fplanet
Are there even 2 million serious blogs on the net?? 🙂
oops, got the wrong blog for Jacques Distler, in the interests of science and accuracy, lets correct that
http://www.technorati.com/blogs/golem.ph.utexas.edu%2F%7Edistler%2Fblog
126,758th place
“I find it very surprising that such a bias and often, factually incorrect, blog like Daily Kos would be number one.”
Yeah, LGF is so much more reliable.
Off-topic response: M&P1, there’s at least one good of it, and it’s something I seriously considered proposing when I lived in the overly-light polluted city of Houston and looked at stars from a parking garage: an hour of lights off for amateur astronomers to see better without going rural.
Look at Sydney, Australia.
I would have been yanking out my binoculars.
Okay…If you want to propose a “Cosmology Hour”, I could get behind that…but only for an hour 😉
Dear James,
The blog ratings are very scientific. It’s just that our idea of ‘best blog’ isn’t. 😉
Right, thank you, here we go…
I imagine time running backwards for billions of years. Space brings everything towards me to a point. The Big Bang I guess. Is it possible for other observers to see the Big Bang such that they are always disconnected from me? Or, is the big bang infinite in extent and infinitely dense at the same time? I mean does theory allow an infinite density that was infinite in extent and has expanded ever since?
Another one.
I kinda understand entanglement. I imagine an annihilation occuring as the observable universe cooled just enough to allow one of the photons to reach me, billions of years later. The photon interacts with me and makes the other do its thing. Does that mean that the effect of me observing a photon here in my living room has affected something else beyond the Hubble radius?
You’ll notice “Cosmic Variance” is on the sidebar of:
http://malcolmpollack.com/
However things turn out, keep in mind President Bush’s remark,
“Information is moving—you know, nightly news is one way, of course, but it’s also moving through the blogosphere and through the Internets.”—Washington, D.C., May 2, 2007……http://www.slate.com/id/76886/pagenum/7
If I were a physicist and able to talk like one, I’d be very careful of what I wished for.
JK
Math is really hard
http://www.newcomensengine.com/2008/03/new-math.html
Perhaps a better word would have been “difficult”, I wouldn’t want to mislead anyone about the nature of the article. It really is about math.
Maybe the fourth place is related to the fact that, according to their statistics, your number of inbound links raised from 613 on 03/25 to 4863 on 03/26. A 790% increase (!?).
Well, I see it was a bug, but it could happen. Racists and mental patients need to sleep sometime.
I find these results disturbing, I had no idea the economy was so bad. But there must be a lot of unemployed pudgy white guys living in their parents’ basements. That’s the only explanation I can come up with for lines 2, 3, 6, and 9.