One of the reasons we (or I, anyway) don’t do more science posts is that it’s hard to do a good job. Cutting and pasting and linking is easy, whereas it takes time to really absorb some interesting scientific concept and present it in a hopefully-understandable way. And we’re all amateur blogging hobbyists with day jobs.
But I had the idea that it might be fun to get glimpses at what is going on in the field by taking occasional amusing papers that appear on arxiv.org, and just reposting their abstracts here with a couple of words. If anyone doesn’t follow the details, that’s okay; think of it as performance art, and the abstracts as little prose poems.
Today’s arxiv find is hep-th/0701252, “Cycling in the Throat” by Easson, Gregory, Tasinato and Zavala. Here’s the abstract:
We analyse the dynamics of a probe D3-(anti-)brane propagating in a warped string compactification, making use of the Dirac-Born-Infeld action approximation. We also examine the time dependent expansion of such moving branes from the “mirage cosmology” perspective, where cosmology is induced by the brane motion in the background spacetime. A range of physically interesting backgrounds are considered: AdS5, Klebanov-Tseytlin and Klebanov-Strassler. Our focus is on exploring what new phenomenology is obtained from giving the brane angular momentum in the extra dimensions. We find that in general, angular momentum creates a centrifugal barrier, causing bouncing cosmologies. More unexpected, and more interesting, is the existence of bound orbits, corresponding to cyclic universes.
See? Poetry. The basic idea here is to explore what can happen when a 3-brane (which could be our visible universe, if all of the particles of the Standard Model were confined to it) doesn’t just sit there in the extra dimensions, but zooms and twirls around like a multidimensional figure skater. Ever since Randall and Sundrum caught on to the fun things that can happen when extra dimensions are “warped,” we continue to discover new and interesting scenarios for these hypothetical directions of space. This paper sets the branes to spinning, and steps back to look at the results, which apparently include bouncing cosmologies. I might worry about stability in the presence of perturbations, but that’s just something to do for a follow-up paper — we’ll never run out of good questions to ask.
Some other fun papers this week:
- Jackiw and Pi, “Chiral Gauge Theory for Graphene,” cond-mat/0701760.
- Bekenstein, “The modified Newtonian dynamics-MOND-and its implications for new physics,” astro-ph/0701848.
- Bojowald, “Quantum gravity and cosmological observations,” gr-qc/0701142.
- Brandenberger, “String Gas Cosmology and Structure Formation – A Brief Review,” hep-th/0702001.
One abstract I found amusing on arxiv last year was this. I was just relieved to know that “…we are highly unlikely to be vacuum fluctuations…”
I think my favorite paper ever in terms of sheer poetry of the title and abstract is gr-qc/9707027
The phrase “arbitrarily short hair” gets me every time.
The king of titles: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0411268
In the you know you’re in trouble when category, not only did I understand the abstract, but the paper sounds darned interesting! I never thought about giving branes angular momentum in the extra dimensions. Hmmmm…one could do stuff with that. In fact, I think I can calculate a collider signature for that. Thanks for pointing this out Sean – you’ve seriously given me a new idea to tinker with!
So….uhhh…how would you calculate that? Step by step. I’m not going to do it, don’t worry. I’m just curious, that’s all.
As far as titles go, hep-th/0107199 is my all time favorite in the “funny titles” category (though perhaps that tells more about me than about the title…)
I think I should avoid commenting on this, since Easson was my postdoc, but I think posting about a particularly interesting arxiv posting is a very good idea.
Pingback: Not Even Wrong » Blog Archive » Odds and Ends
Uncle Enzo: You’ll be the first to know when the paper comes out! Seriously, we live in a competitive climate and I can’t divulge my calculation ideas until it’s finished (if/when). But, I am excited about the idea and never dreamed research ideas would propagate from a blog!
Here’s one of my favorites(?):
Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0005546
From: Vladimir A. Lefebvre
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 01:51:28 GMT (15kb)
Cosmic Intelligence and Black Holes
Authors: Vladimir A. Lefebvre, Yuri N. Efremov
Comments: 13 pages, accepted for publication at Zemlia i Vselennaya (Earth
and Universe) for No.4, 2000
Journal-ref: Zemlya i Vselennaya (Earth and the Universe), 5 (2000) 69-83
The paper is devoted to a new direction in SETI. After a general discussion of the field, the authors put forth the hypothesis that the black holes may serve as a physical substratum for intelligent beings. This hypothesis is based on four parallels between the brain-psyche system, on the one hand, and black holes, on the other. (1) The descriptions of brain and psyche, in the system brain-psyche, are complementary to each other, as descriptions by internal and external observers of a black hole in Susskind-t’Hooft’s schema. (2) There is an aspect of the inner structure of a black hole in Kerr’s model of the rotating black hole that is isomorphic to the structure of the human subjective domain in the psychological model of reflexion. (3) Both black holes and the brain-psyche system have a facet which can be represented using thermodynamic concepts. (4) The brain lends itself to a holographic description; as has been recently demonstrated by Susskind, black holes can also be described holographically. The authors speculate that the intelligent black holes can generate other black holes by triggering creation of massive stars from which new black holes arise after the stars’ collapse. In addition, the authors analyze certain strange phenomena related to the birth of young massive stars which may or may not be connected with such a triggering.
Skating away on the thin ice of ….
… a cold, icy, bottomless, viscous mass, where my brain ceases to exist in the form known as “I”.
Yes, Arun, that’s what some of these ArXiV abstracts do to my mind. 🙂
There’s a statistics paper entitled “The Earth is round (p
As far as “holy” titles go, I’d say this is the best: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9610135
See also:
The Stupid Title List
decapitating tadpoles
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0209226
I remember reading about the Cosmologist who wrote a pedantic sounding but meaningless paper using common technical terms in his field, and got it published in a Humanities research journal.
‘Would Bohr be born if Bohm were born before Born?’
physics/0702069
Took me 5 minutes to get through that sentence!
Pingback: Anomalous Presumptions » Metaphysics that matters